We use the US legal standard for evaluating evidence

Revision as of 20:16, 3 February 2025 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== We use the US legal standard for evaluating evidence == Introduction: "a brick is not a wall". [TBD] === Evidence does not equal proof === === Evidence can be relevant or irrelevant === Evidence is relevant if it tends to make the issue at hand '''more or less likely to be true'''. === Evidence can be strong or weak === ==== There are many kinds of evidence, some stronger than others ==== === All relevant evidence (whether strong or weak) should be considered ===...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

We use the US legal standard for evaluating evidence

Introduction: "a brick is not a wall". [TBD]

Evidence does not equal proof

Evidence can be relevant or irrelevant

Evidence is relevant if it tends to make the issue at hand more or less likely to be true.

Evidence can be strong or weak

There are many kinds of evidence, some stronger than others

All relevant evidence (whether strong or weak) should be considered

And the strongest relevant evidence should be given the most weight.